Positive feedback loops
Agents reinforce the same conclusion or repeatedly trigger one another.
Multi-Agent Reliability
When multiple agents coordinate, system behavior can exceed the intent of any single prompt. Feedback loops, duplicated work, strategic behavior, and resource contention can emerge from otherwise reasonable local decisions.
Treat the interaction protocol as a product interface. Constrain roles and resources, simulate adversarial and high-load scenarios, trace message causality, and enforce system-level stop conditions that no individual agent can override.
Use these dimensions to make the architecture decision explicit and testable.
Agents reinforce the same conclusion or repeatedly trigger one another.
Workers duplicate effort, wait indefinitely, or overwrite shared state.
Local objectives gradually replace the original system goal.
Agents compete for tools, budgets, locks, or human attention.
Use these dimensions to make the architecture decision explicit and testable.
Define message schemas, role permissions, ownership, timeouts, and conflict resolution.
Use transactional state and version checks rather than relying on conversational memory.
Enforce budgets, safety, and termination outside the agents.
Provide pause, inspect, override, and rollback capabilities.
Use these dimensions to make the architecture decision explicit and testable.
Vary latency, tool failures, malicious messages, partial data, and agent counts.
Assert properties that must always hold, such as spend limits and approval requirements.
Record which message or state change caused each downstream action.
Test collusion, prompt injection propagation, privilege escalation, and denial of service.
Use this as a design-review gate before release.
Place this pattern inside a broader agent architecture and operating model.
Browse memory, planning, frameworks, reliability, safety, and observability.
Open the tutorial library →Start with agent features, design patterns, benefits, challenges, and industry applications.
Open the guide →